Michael Corey's Database Virtualization/Database Administration as a Service® Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer

Posted on Fri, Jan 22, 2010 @ 02:00 PM
  
  
  
  

This alert is to provide you with an overview of Microsoft Security Bulletin MS10-002, the Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer, released (out-of-band) on Thursday, January 21. This bulletin addresses eight vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer. Microsoft recommends that partners secure their own systems, then reach out to customers to assist them in ensuring their systems are secured.
 

KEY RESOURCES


·        We recommend Microsoft partners use the Microsoft TechNet Security TechCenter as a source of security information http://technet.microsoft.com/security

·        Security Bulletin MS10-002 – Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (978207):
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS10-002.mspx

·        Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) Blog: http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/

·        Internet Explorer 8 Deployment Guide:**http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc985339.aspx**

 

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

My Personal Twitter Account: Michael_Corey

Ntirety Corporate Twitter Account: Ntirety

 

www.ntirety.com

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Facebook New Terms Of Service - Watch Out

Posted on Sun, Feb 15, 2009 @ 10:35 PM
  
  
  
  

A very old saying  Caveat Emptor or in english  "Buyer Beware" or in the case of Facebook, should I say to all 175 Million users in over 30 languages "Facebook User Beware". They just changed there term of service agreement and they own your content. Yes I said that correctly, if you put something on Facebook, you are giving facebook rights to it forever.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a scary thought. The lawyers will have a field day to this and rightly so, Think of all the people who use Facebook. Celebrities all the way to the average Joe. I am not sure this is a reasonable stance for Facebook to take.


It use to be once you removed something from Facebook their rights to the information expired. With this most recent change, they own rights to the pictures, comments forever.  My hat goes off to The Consumerist who discovered this and is publishing this fact out to the world.


Here is a portion of that article...

Facebook's New Terms Of Service: "We Can Do Anything We Want With Your Content. Forever."

By Chris Walters, 6:14 PM on Sun Feb 15 2009

Facebook's terms of service (TOS) used to say that when you closed an account on their network, any rights they claimed to the original content you uploaded would expire. Not anymore. Now, anything you upload to Facebook can be used by Facebook in any way they deem fit, forever, no matter what you do later. Want to close your account? Good for you, but Facebook still has the right to do whatever it wants with your old content. They can even sublicense it if they want.

You hereby grant Facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to (a) use, copy, publish, stream, store, retain, publicly perform or display, transmit, scan, reformat, modify, edit, frame, translate, excerpt, adapt, create derivative works and distribute (through multiple tiers), any User Content you (i) Post on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof subject only to your privacy settings or (ii) enable a user to Post, including by offering a Share Link on your website and (b) to use your name, likeness and image for any purpose, including commercial or advertising, each of (a) and (b) on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof.

That language is the same as in the old TOS, but there was an important couple of lines at the end of that section that have been removed:

You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. If you choose to remove your User Content, the license granted above will automatically expire, however you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content.

To read the entire article....

The Consumerist Facebook New Terms of Service


I will end this blog as I started it...

A very old saying  Caveat Emptor or in english  "Buyer Beware" or in the case of Facebook, should I say to all 175 Million users in over 30 languages "Facebook User Beware"

After this blog came out, Facebook commented on this recent change to the terms of service....

On Facebook, People Own and Control Their Information

by Mark Zuckerberg Today at 2:09pm

A couple of weeks ago, we updated our terms of use to clarify a few points for our users. A number of people have raised questions about our changes, so I'd like to address those here. I'll also take the opportunity to explain how we think about people's information.

Our philosophy is that people own their information and control who they share it with. When a person shares information on Facebook, they first need to grant Facebook a license to use that information so that we can show it to the other people they've asked us to share it with. Without this license, we couldn't help people share that information.

 


One of the questions about our new terms of use is whether Facebook can use this information forever. When a person shares something like a message with a friend, two copies of that information are created—one in the person's sent messages box and the other in their friend's inbox. Even if the person deactivates their account, their friend still has a copy of that message. We think this is the right way for Facebook to work, and it is consistent with how other services like email work. One of the reasons we updated our terms was to make this more clear.

In reality, we wouldn't share your information in a way you wouldn't want. The trust you place in us as a safe place to share information is the most important part of what makes Facebook work. Our goal is to build great products and to communicate clearly to help people share more information in this trusted environment.

We still have work to do to communicate more clearly about these issues, and our terms are one example of this. Our philosophy that people own their information and control who they share it with has remained constant. A lot of the language in our terms is overly formal and protective of the rights we need to provide this service to you. Over time we will continue to clarify our positions and make the terms simpler.

Still, the interesting thing about this change in our terms is that it highlights the importance of these issues and their complexity. People want full ownership and control of their information so they can turn off access to it at any time. At the same time, people also want to be able to bring the information others have shared with them—like email addresses, phone numbers, photos and so on—to other services and grant those services access to those people's information. These two positions are at odds with each other. There is no system today that enables me to share my email address with you and then simultaneously lets me control who you share it with and also lets you control what services you share it with.

We're at an interesting point in the development of the open online world where these issues are being worked out. It's difficult terrain to navigate and we're going to make some missteps, but as the leading service for sharing information we take these issues and our responsibility to help resolve them very seriously. This is a big focus for us this year, and I'll post some more thoughts on openness and these other issues soon.

I placed Mark Zuckerbergs comments here for convience. Here is the link to the original....

 On Facebook, People Own and Control Their Information 

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

Twitter: Michael_Corey

Twitter: Ntirety

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

New Firefox Release - Fixes Security Issues

Posted on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 @ 10:39 PM
  
  
  
  

Firefox just released a new version that addresses several security issues. Here is an excert from the article I saw in PCWORLD.

New Firefox Release Fixes Critical Security Bugs

Robert McMillan, IDG News Service

Feb 3, 2009 7:40 pm
Mozilla developers released the latest version of their Firefox browser Tuesday, version 3.0.6, which fixes several security bugs in the software.

The most critical issues are bugs in the browser's JavaScript and layout engines that could be exploited by attackers to run unauthorized software on a victim's PC, Mozilla said. The flaws also affect Mozilla's Thunderbird e-mail client and SeaMonkey Internet software suite.

To read the entire article in PCWORLD.... New Firefox Release Fixes Critical Security Bugs



Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Vulnerability in SQL Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution

Posted on Mon, Dec 22, 2008 @ 10:50 PM
  
  
  
  

Microsoft Security Advisory (961040)

Vulnerability in SQL Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution

Published: December 22, 2008

Microsoft is investigating new public reports of a vulnerability that could allow remote code execution on systems with supported editions of Microsoft SQL Server 2000, Microsoft SQL Server 2005, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition, Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine (MSDE 2000), Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine (WMSDE), and Windows Internal Database (WYukon). Systems with Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 Service Pack 4, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 3, and Microsoft SQL Server 2008 are not affected by this issue.

Microsoft is aware that exploit code has been published on the Internet for the vulnerability addressed by this advisory. Our investigation of this exploit code has verified that it does not affect systems that have had the workarounds listed below applied. Currently, Microsoft is not aware of active attacks that use this exploit code or of customer impact at this time.

In addition, due to the mitigating factors for default installations of MSDE 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express, Microsoft is not currently aware of any third-party applications that use MSDE 2000 or SQL Server 2005 Express which would be vulnerable to remote attack. However, Microsoft is actively monitoring this situation to provide customer guidance as necessary.

We are actively working with partners in our Microsoft Active Protections Program (MAPP) and our Microsoft Security Response Alliance (MSRA) programs to provide information that they can use to provide broader protections to customers.

Upon completion of this investigation, Microsoft will take the appropriate action to protect our customers, which may include providing a solution through a service pack, our monthly security update release process, or an out-of-cycle security update, depending on customer needs.

Customers who believe that they have been attacked can obtain security support at Get security support and should contact the national law enforcement agency in their country. Customers in the United States can contact Customer Service and Support at no charge using the PC Safety hotline at 1-866-PCSAFETY. Additionally, customers in the United States should contact their local FBI office or report their situation at Internet Crime Complaint Center.

Mitigating Factors:

This issue does not affect supported editions of Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 Service Pack 4, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 3, and Microsoft SQL Server 2008.

This vulnerability is not exposed anonymously. An attacker would need to either authenticate to exploit the vulnerability or take advantage of a SQL injection vulnerability in a Web application that is able to authenticate.

By default, MSDE 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express do not allow remote connections. An authenticated attacker would need to initiate the attack locally to exploit the vulnerability.

 

To read the original security alert from Microsoft......

Microsoft Security Advisory (961040)


Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

If you use Internet Explorer IE Read This ! !

Posted on Thu, Dec 18, 2008 @ 11:06 AM
  
  
  
  

 

This is a pretty important security Bulletin. If you use Internet Explorer and go to a specially crafted web page you could be at real risk.....

 

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-078 - Critical

Security Update for Internet Explorer (960714)

 

 

Executive Summary

This security update resolves a publicly disclosed vulnerability. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a user views a specially crafted Web page using Internet Explorer. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.

This security update is rated Critical for Internet Explorer 5.01, Internet Explorer 6, Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1, and Internet Explorer 7. For information about Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2, please see the section, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Related to This Security Update. For more information, see the subsection, Affected and Non-Affected Software, in this section.

The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying the way Internet Explorer validates data binding parameters and handles the error resulting in the exploitable condition. For more information about the vulnerability, see the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) subsection under the next section, Vulnerability Information.

This security update also addresses the vulnerability first described in Microsoft Security Advisory 961051.

Recommendation. Microsoft recommends that customers apply the update immediately.

Affected and Non-Affected Software

The software listed here have been tested to determine which versions or editions are affected. Other versions or editions are either past their support life cycle or are not affected. To determine the support life cycle for your software version or edition, visit Microsoft Support Lifecycle.

Affected Software

Operating SystemComponentMaximum Security ImpactAggregate Severity RatingBulletins Replaced by This Update
Internet Explorer 5.01 and Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1    

Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.01 Service Pack 4

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Internet Explorer 6    

Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows XP Service Pack 3

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 and Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition and Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 with SP1 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2003 with SP2 for Itanium-based Systems

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Internet Explorer 7    

Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows XP Service Pack 3

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 and Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition and Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 with SP1 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2003 with SP2 for Itanium-based Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Vista and Windows Vista Service Pack 1

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Vista x64 Edition and Windows Vista x64 Edition Service Pack 1

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Note For information about Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2, please see the section, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Related to This Security Update.

Vulnerability Information

Severity Ratings and Vulnerability Identifiers

Pointer Reference Memory Corruption Vulnerability - CVE-2008-4844

Update Information

Detection and Deployment Tools and Guidance

Security Update Deployment

 

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-078 - Critical


Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Massachusetts New Law - Protection of Personal Information

Posted on Thu, Nov 20, 2008 @ 01:25 PM
  
  
  
  

Minimum Standard for protection of personal information

In the Commonwealth of Massachusetts we have a new (law)  regulation that establishes minimum standards to be met in connection with the safeguarding of personal information contained in both paper and electronic records. Its my understanding this effects all business. It has been postponed till May 2009. but it is the law.


For your light reading late at night, here is a copy of the law....

201 CMR 17.00: Standards for The Protection of Personal Information of Residents of the Commonwealth


Section:

17.01: Purpose and Scope
17.02: Definitions
17.03: Duty to Protect and Standards for Protecting Personal Information
17.04: Computer System Security Requirements

17.01   Purpose and Scope

(a)        Purpose
This regulation implements the provisions of M.G.L. c. 93H relative to the standards to be met by persons who own, license, store or maintain personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  This regulation establishes minimum standards to be met in connection with the safeguarding of personal information contained in both paper and electronic records.  Further purposes are to (i) ensure the security and confidentiality of such information in a manner consistent with industry standards, (ii) protect against anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information, and (iii) protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information in a manner that creates a substantial risk of identity theft or fraud against such residents.

(b)        Scope
The provisions of this regulation apply to all persons that own, license, store or maintain personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth. 

17.02:   Definitions

The following words as used herein shall, unless the context requires otherwise, have the following meanings:

"Breach of security", the unauthorized acquisition or unauthorized use of unencrypted data or, encrypted electronic data and  the confidential process or key that is capable of compromising the security, confidentiality, or integrity of personal information, maintained by a person or agency that creates a substantial risk of identity theft or fraud against a resident of the commonwealth.  A good faith but unauthorized acquisition of personal information by a person or agency, or employee or agent thereof, for the lawful purposes of such person or agency, is not a breach of security unless the personal information is used in an unauthorized manner or subject to further unauthorized disclosure.

 “Electronic,” relating to technology having electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electromagnetic or similar capabilities.

"Encrypted," the transformation of data through the use of an algorithmic process, or an alternative method at least as secure, into a form in which meaning cannot be assigned without the use of a confidential process or key, unless further defined by regulation by the office of consumer affairs and business regulation.

“Person,” a natural person, corporation, association, partnership or other legal entity, other than an agency, executive office, department, board, commission, bureau, division or authority of the Commonwealth, or any of its branches, or any political subdivision thereof.

"Personal information," a  Massachusetts resident's first name and last name or first initial and last name in combination with any one or more of the following data elements that relate to such resident: (a)  Social Security number; (b)  driver's license number or state-issued identification card number; or (c)  financial account number, or credit or debit card number, with or without any required security code, access code, personal identification number or password, that would permit access to a resident’s financial account; provided, however, that “Personal information” shall not include information that is lawfully obtained from publicly available information, or from federal, state or local government records lawfully made available to the general public.

“Record” or “Records,” any material upon which written, drawn, spoken, visual, or electromagnetic information or images are recorded or preserved, regardless of physical form or characteristics.

17.03:  Duty to Protect and Standards for Protecting Personal Information

Every person that owns, licenses, stores or maintains personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth shall develop, implement, maintain and monitor a comprehensive, written information security program applicable to any records containing such personal information.  Such comprehensive information security program shall be reasonably consistent with industry standards, and shall contain administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of such records.  Moreover, the safeguards contained in such program must be consistent with the safeguards for protection of personal information and information of a similar character set forth in any state or federal regulations by which the person who owns, licenses, stores or maintains such information may be regulated.

Whether the comprehensive information security program is in compliance with these regulations for the protection of personal information, whether pursuant to section 17.03 or 17.04 hereof, shall be evaluated taking into account (i) the size, scope and type of business of the person obligated to safeguard the personal information under such comprehensive information security program, (ii) the amount of resources available to such person, (iii) the amount of stored data, and (iv) the need for security and confidentiality of both consumer and employee information.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, every comprehensive information security program shall include, but shall not be limited to:

(a)        Designating one or more employees to maintain the comprehensive information security program;

(b)        Identifying and assessing reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to the security, confidentiality, and/or integrity of any electronic, paper or other records containing personal information, and evaluating and improving, where necessary, the effectiveness of the current safeguards for  limiting such risks, including but not limited to: (i) ongoing employee (including temporary and contract employee) training; (ii) employee compliance with policies and procedures; and (iii) means for detecting and preventing security system failures.

(c)        Developing security policies for employees that take into account whether and how employees should be allowed to keep, access and transport records containing personal information outside of business premises.

(d)        Imposing disciplinary measures for violations of the comprehensive information security program rules.

(e)        Preventing terminated employees from accessing records containing personal information by immediately terminating their physical and electronic access to such records, including deactivating their passwords and user names.

(f)         Taking reasonable steps to verify that third-party service providers with access to personal information have the capacity to protect such personal information, including (i) selecting and retaining service providers that are capable of maintaining safeguards for personal information; and (ii) contractually requiring service providers to maintain such safeguards.  Prior to permitting third-party service providers access to personal information, the person permitting such access shall obtain from the third-party service provider a written certification that such service provider has a written, comprehensive information security program that is in compliance with the provisions of these regulations.

(g)        Limiting the amount of personal information collected to that reasonably necessary to accomplish the legitimate purpose for which it is collected; limiting the time such information is retained to that reasonably necessary to accomplish such purpose; and limiting access to those persons who are reasonably required to know such information in order to accomplish such purpose or to comply with state or federal record retention requirements.

(h)        Identifying paper, electronic and other records, computing systems, and storage media, including laptops and portable devices used to store personal information, to determine which records contain personal information, except where the comprehensive information security program provides for the handling of all records as if they all contained personal information.

(i)         Reasonable restrictions upon physical access to records containing personal information, including a written procedure that sets forth the manner in which physical access to such records is restricted; and storage of such records and data in locked facilities, storage areas or containers.

(j)         Regular monitoring to ensure that the comprehensive information security program is operating in a manner reasonably calculated to prevent unauthorized access to or unauthorized use of personal information; and upgrading information safeguards as necessary to limit risks. 

(k)        Reviewing the scope of the security measures at least annually or whenever there is a material change in business practices that may reasonably implicate the security or integrity of records containing personal information. 

(l)         Documenting responsive actions taken in connection with any incident involving a breach of security, and mandatory post-incident review of events and actions taken, if any, to make changes in business practices relating to protection of personal information.

17.04:  Computer System Security Requirements

Every person that owns, licenses, stores or maintains personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth and electronically stores or transmits such information shall include in its written, comprehensive information security program the establishment and maintenance of a security system covering its computers, including any wireless system, that, at a minimum, shall have the following elements:

(1)        Secure user authentication protocols including:

(i)         control of user IDs and other identifiers;
(ii)        a reasonably secure method of assigning and selecting passwords, or use of unique identifier technologies, such as biometrics or token devices;
(iii)       control of data security passwords to ensure that such passwords are kept in a location and/or format that does not compromise the security of the data they protect;
(iv)       restricting access to active users and active user accounts only; and
(v)        blocking access to user identification after multiple unsuccessful attempts to gain access or the limitation placed on access for the particular system;

(2)        Secure access control measures that:

(i)         restrict access to records and files containing personal information to those who need such information to perform their job duties; and
(ii)        assign unique identifications plus passwords, which are not vendor supplied default passwords, to each person with computer access, that are reasonably designed to maintain the integrity of the security of the access controls;

(3)        To the extent technically feasible, encryption of all transmitted records and files containing personal information that will travel across public networks, and encryption of all data to be transmitted wirelessly.

(4)        Reasonable monitoring of systems, for unauthorized use of or access to personal information;

(5)        Encryption of all personal information stored on laptops or other portable devices;

(6)        For files containing personal information on a system that is connected to the Internet, there must be reasonably up-to-date firewall protection and operating system security patches, reasonably designed to maintain the integrity of the personal information. 

 (7)       Reasonably up-to-date versions of system security agent software which must include malware protection and reasonably up-to-date patches and virus definitions, or a version of such software that can still be supported with up-to-date patches and virus definitions, and is set to receive the most current security updates on a regular basis.

(8)        Education and training of employees on the proper use of the computer security system and the importance of personal information security.

17.05:  Effective Date
These regulations shall take effect on January 1, 2009.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY:
201 CMR 17.00:   M.G.L. c. 93H

It is my understanding, this will not go into effect now till May, 2009. You shoud go to the actual state law, for the most current information.

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

1 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Nigerian Scammers Infiltrate FaceBook Accounts

Posted on Mon, Nov 10, 2008 @ 09:35 PM
  
  
  
  

I became acutely aware first hand how important it is to protect oneself online, when my 20 year sons Identity was stolen. It hit home so hard, that I have written a number of blog entrys on it. Ntirety also has launched a practice that specializes in Database Security. Here are some of my past blogs....

You thought you had to worry about your identity being stolen what about that of your PC. Identity theft is a real problem and keeps growing.

On January 30th, 2008, I talked about how my son who is attending college Identity was stolen. Who would have thoguht they would steal the credit identity of a 20 year old. Click here to read the blog entry..

Identity Theft Hits Home - Lessoned Learned 

In that blog I give you many helpful hints on what to do when your credit identity is stolen. It loaded with a lot of useful tips.

On August 14th, 2008, I posted a video of someone using a SQL Injection attack to break into an Oracle Linux database. Seeing how easy it was is quite a shock. Face it there big money is stealing the information stored in an Oracle Database, SQL Server Database and any other database that contains credit card information, etc.

Click here to see the video of a SQL Injection attack..

 SQL Injection Attack Oracle LINUX Database 

 

What is clear to me, that you have to be very careful. The latest blog in on Nigerian Scammers who recently infiltrated Facebook. It comes to me via the 

Sydney Morning Herald

Cyber criminals target Facebook users

Asher Moses
November 10, 2008 - 2:27PM

Facebook has been infiltrated by Nigerian scammers and other cyber criminals who use compromised accounts to con users out of cash.

Now that even non-tech savvy internet users know not to respond to, or click on links in, emails from strangers, online thieves have turned to social networks and are finding it is easier to trick people when posing as their friends.

On Friday, Sydneysider Karina Wells received a Facebook message from one of her friends, Adrian, saying he was stranded in Lagos, Nigeria, and needed her to lend him $500 for a ticket home.

Adrian used relatively good English but, after chatting further, words such as "cell" instead of "mobile phone" tipped Wells off that she was not talking to her friend but someone who had taken over his account.

Using sites such as Facebook allows scammers to research and target victims more effectively and avoid having their messages blocked by spam filters, said Paul Ducklin, head of technology at Sophos Asia Pacific.

It is likely the scammer obtained Adrian's Facebook login details after he was infected with a virus delivered by email or in an infected web page.

There are a number of viruses which, once installed on a computer, send back to the hacker a detailed log of everything entered using the keyboard, including online banking details and passwords for services such as Facebook.

Wells played along with the scammer, who asked her to transfer the money into a Western Union account.

"Naturally I was concerned as, to all intents and purposes, this seemed to be legitimate," she said.

"I pretended that I would help, obtained all the details of where he was and forwarded them to both Facebook and the relevant authorities."

But while the Nigerian scammer used the compromised Facebook account coupled with social engineering tactics to try to convince Wells to hand over money, many are using compromised accounts to spread malware.

Typically, the victim receives a Facebook message from a friend with a subject such as "LOL. You've been catched on hidden cam, yo" or "Nice dancing! Shouldn't you be ashamed?"

The body of the message contains a video clip link that appears to go to a legitimate site such as Facebook or YouTube but, when clicked on, it takes the user to a bogus web page.

Before the users can play the video they are told they need to download a video player upgrade, which is in fact a password-stealing virus.

The next time the victim logs into Facebook the malware-laden message is sent to all of their friends and the infected link is automatically added in comments on friends' pages.

Other less sophisticated attacks on Facebook members use spam emails, some appearing to come from Facebook itself, to spread viruses.

In September security firm WebSense reported on spam emails, purportedly sent from an @facebookmail.com address, that tell the victim they have received an invitation from Facebook to add a friend.

"The spammers included a zip attachment that purports to contain a picture in order to entice the recipient to double-click on it. The attached file is actually a Trojan horse," WebSense said.

To read the Original Article...

Cyber criminals target Facebook Users

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-067 (More Resources)

Posted on Fri, Oct 24, 2008 @ 03:14 PM
  
  
  
  

As you are well aware if you read my previous blog entry, Microsoft has just released a new crtical patch Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-067 

Here are some FAQ's


What is the scope of the vulnerability?

This is a remote code execution vulnerability. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of an affected system remotely. On Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003 systems, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability over RPC without authentication to run arbitrary code. It is possible that this vulnerability could be used in the crafting of a wormable exploit. If successfully exploited, an attacker could then install programs or view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.

What causes the vulnerability? 

The vulnerability is caused by the Windows Server service not properly handling specially crafted RPC requests.

What is the Server service? 

The Server service provides RPC support, file and print support, and named pipe sharing over the network. The Server service allows the sharing of your local resources (such as disks and printers) so that other users on the network can access them. It also allows named pipe communication between applications running on other computers and your computer, which is used for RPC.

What is RPC? 

Remote Procedure Call (RPC) is a protocol that a program can use to request a service from a program located on another computer in a network. RPC helps with interoperability because the program using RPC does not have to understand the network protocols that are supporting communication. In RPC, the requesting program is the client and the service-providing program is the server.

What might an attacker use the vulnerability to do? 

 An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of the affected system.

How could an attacker exploit the vulnerability? 

An attacker could try to exploit the vulnerability by sending a specially crafted message to an affected system. On Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003 systems, any anonymous user with access to the target network could deliver a specially crafted network packet to the affected system in order to exploit this vulnerability. On Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 systems, however, only an authenticated user with access to the target network could deliver a specially crafted network packet to the affected system in order to exploit this vulnerability.

What systems are primarily at risk from the vulnerability?

While all workstations and servers are at risk regarding this issue, systems running Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP, or Windows Server 2003 are primarily at risk due to the unique characteristics of the vulnerability and affected code path.

 

What does the update do? 

The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the manner in which the Server service handles RPC requests.

When this security bulletin was issued, had Microsoft received any reports that this vulnerability was being exploited? 

Yes. Microsoft is aware of limited, targeted attacks attempting to exploit the vulnerability. However, when the security bulletin was released, Microsoft had not seen any examples of proof of concept code published.

Does applying this security update help protect customers from the code that attempts to exploit this vulnerability? 

Yes. This security update addresses the vulnerability that is currently being exploited. The vulnerability that has been addressed has been assigned the Common Vulnerability and Exposure number. CVE-2008-4250


Here are some additional resources you should be aware of.......


Full bulletin for MS08-067 is available at

Full bulletin for MS08-067


File information details can be found in

Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 958644

 ******

Security Updates Are Available from...

Office Update

Microsoft Update

Windows Update
 


Microsoft TechNet Security TechCenter as a source of security information:

http://technet.microsoft.com/security

Security updates are also available from

the Microsoft Download Center

Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer

Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer

 

Note this was updated from original Post

Posted by Michael Corey, Founder & CEO

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Is Your Database Safe From Harm ! ! !

Posted on Thu, Oct 16, 2008 @ 10:02 PM
  
  
  
  

Many a company did not take security serious enough and has paid the price. The problem is not only did they pay the price, but so did there customers. Too many times in the past few years, have I had to request new credit cards to protect myself.

My oldest child who was  attending college even had his identity stolen. I wrote a blog entry with lots of useful information....

Identity Theft Hits Home - Lessons Learned

 


One of the most important jobs of a DBA is the protection of your corporate data. From Internal and external threats. As if the job of a DBA was not hard enough, they now have the added burden of dealing with Security. In many small companies the DBA is your defacto security officer.

Many of Ntirety's clients ask us what their options are in terms of protecting the Database from External and Internal threats. The correct answer to that question depends on a lot of factors specific to your situation and budget.

A good friend of mine Paresh Amin has agreed to do a webinar on the value of Database Penetration & vulnerability testing.  I have known Paresh since he worked at State Street Bank. Paresh is a CISSP, former Director of Information Security with Experian. Paresh is very articulate and very knowledgeable about all the options open to you when securing your database.  Paresh is very knowledgeable on the whole suite of software and hardware options also. Anyone interested in learning more on the topic of Database Security should attend this webinar.
Here is the description of the webinar…

Ntirety, The Database Administration Experts To Discuss The Value of Database Penetration & Vulnerability Testing

Ntirety invites Paresh Amin, a CISSP, former Director of Information Security with Experian and Tizor Systems, to discuss some of the best practices to maintain a high level of database security. His presentation will focus on the importance of Database Penetration and Vulnerability Testing, in today's highly sensitive information security world.

During this webinar, Mr. Amin will discuss:

  •  Why backend database testing is just as vital as front end testing
  •  How to avoid backend database malfunctions that cause things like: system deadlock, data corruption, poor database performance, and data loss
  •  An overview of backend database testing (functional vs. structural)
  •  An overview of high profile database attacks in the past few years


By attending this event you will walk away with an understanding of the overall benefits of a database vulnerability assessment (or database penetration test) and some basic ideas on how to structure your own database security testing policies.

To learn more and sign up to attend the Webinar .......

Ntirety, The Database Administration Experts To Discuss The Value of Database Penetration Vulnerability Testing

Posted Michael Corey, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

SpeedDate Hijacks Facebook Users Accounts

Posted on Sat, Sep 13, 2008 @ 03:55 PM
  
  
  
  

I just saw this article on Techcrunch.com I want to share with everyone. The Article is

SpeedDate, the online dating site that throws singles in a series of rapid dating sessions, has hijacked over 500,000 users from at least three Facebook applications. Users are logging on to Facebook to find that the applications they’ve had installed for months have been replaced with SpeedDate without being asked to opt-in.

As far as we can tell, all three modified applications were developed by HappyAppy, so it’s likely that SpeedDate either acquired the company with the $6 million it raised last month or the two companies share the same development team. Users are being sent brief messages notifying them that their applications have been renamed and “improved”, but only after the switch has been made without their consent.

The three affected applications are:

  • Have You Ever??? (353,217 monthly active users)
  • Would You Rather (158,291)
  • Romantic Gifts (28,164)

In effect each of these applications has acted as a Trojan Horse, getting install permissions under false pretenses only to pull the bait-and-switch later on. Dozens of users have exhibited outrage over the swap in the review section of each application. It’s likely that such dishonest tactics are against Facebook’s Terms of Service, but after at least ten days of complaints Facebook has yet to act.

Here is a picture of the founders of speeddate....


On August 9, 2008, I posted an article titled Face Book and Hi5 Security Advice.

What is clear there are always companies and people trying to exploit information. I am disapointed in facebook response to what Speeddate has done. Facebook should be a better custodian of peoples information. Having said that there is no excuse for what Speeddate did.

 

 

How many people out there use the same password for many of their accounts ? What if this trojan application that was planted, was stealing credit card information. This just highlights how important it is to protect yourself on the Internet. 

Posted by Michael Corey

www.ntirety.com

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

All Posts | Next Page