Michael Corey's Database Virtualization/Database Administration as a Service® Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Oracle, Salesforce, Larry Ellison, Marc Benioff, The Universe and Beyond

Posted on Tue, Dec 23, 2008 @ 11:25 PM
  
  
  
  

Oracle Set Its Sights On Salesforce.com is that what is really going on?


I have been working with Oracle since version 3.  Over the years at times it seemed when I observed Oracle I was watching a good soap opera.  I suppose that could be said of any big company. On the Latest Oracle Fiscal Second Quarter conference call it appears that Oracle now has set Salesforce.com in its sights.


Oracle Target = Salesforce.com


To use an Oracle term I use to hear over the years. When Oracle sets a company in its sight it means “shut off its oxygen”. Though in this case I would not think that is the intention.  So in this latest Fiscal Second Quarter conference call Salesforce.com got quite a bit of attention. In years past I use to listen to these calls, I dont take the time anymore. So I will rely in ZD to provide you some background.

December 19th, 2008
Oracle puts Salesforce.com in its sights
Posted by Larry Dignan @ 4:49 am

Oracle’s fiscal second quarter conference call was interesting on a couple of fronts. Here are a few observations:

No. 1: Oracle has a new whipping boy: Salesforce.com.

Check out CEO Larry Ellison’s comments about Salesforce.com, which totaled eight mentions (not quite SAP territory, but getting there), on the company’s second quarter conference call. The call came after solid earnings results.

In sales on demand, our primary competitor there is salesforce.com and this quarter was conspicuous and a series of competitive wins against salesforce.com. One which was our largest ever on demand or cloud computing, whatever you want to call it, a competitive win over salesforce.com was actually a replacement of salesforce.com.

The customer will be de-installing salesforce and replacing it with Oracle sales on demand so we’re very excited about that. That business is now growing.

When we compete head-to-head with salesforce we win more deals then we lose and that’s new in the last couple of quarters.

And then there was co-president Charles Phillips:

We have strong customer adoption at Siemens, we had a 12,000-seat win, that’s [inaudible] implementation and we’ll become the standard there. US Food Service where we beat salesforce.com about 7,000 users there. [Matreol] Healthcare displaced salesforce.com there and in West Pack where we also beat saleforce.com.

So we have had quite a bit of momentum there and I forgot to mention [Swisscom] as well, another 3,000 seats.

Add it up and you have eight mentions of Salesforce.com from Oracle. You can read that mean:

Oracle is going to buy Salesforce.com. The smack talk can preclude a merger. After all, executives said the company is still shopping for deals.


Or Oracle is acknowledging that Salesforce.com is moving upstream and becoming a threat and Ellison is sending a brushback pitch. Speaking of Salesforce.com obsession Oracle just announced a bunch of CRM on demand wins (statement).

To read the remaninder of this Article in ZDNET....

Oracle puts Salesforce.com In Its Sights

The Marc Benioff Larry Ellison Relationship

First To Better Understand what is happening a little background information...

If my memory serves me right, Larry Ellison was an early investor in Salesforce.com. At one point very early in Salesforce.com history Larry Ellison was asked to be on the Board of Directors by the Salesforce founder Marc Benioff a former Oracle Employee.  Then Larry Ellison was asked to resign from the Salesforce.com board due to a conflict of interest. That conflict of interest was Oracle launching a direct competitor called OraclesalesOnline.com. It is also my understanding that Marc and Larry Ellison knew each other before Marc went to work for Oracle. 

When Marc Benioff was at Oracle I had the pleasure of have a lot of dealing with Marc. Marc very early on was a true visionary. Marc always stood out from others. At Oracle he introduced a number of initiatives that had major impact on directions Oracle was taking. When Marc left  Oracle I felt it was a real loss. I always knew Marc was headed for great things,

What I liked most about this article was the conclusions. 

Oracle is acknowledging that Salesforce.com is moving upstream and becoming a threat and Ellison is sending a brushback pitch

Anyone who is familiar with Salesforce.com knows they are definitely moving upstream in a big way.  Saleforce.com is a true development platform already. It is already letting people realize the power of cloud computing.  I could go on for pages on where Salesforce.com is headed but would take this blog way off topic. Suffice to say Salesforce.com is headed upstream in a big way. 

Oracle is going to buy Salesforce.com. The smack talk can preclude a merger. After all, executives said the company is still shopping for deals.

There are so many great reasons why Oracle should buy Salesforce.com

The companies are very synergistic.


Salesforce could really benefit from Oracle dominant position in the enterprise as it moved forward with its development platform. With Oracle behind salesforce.com it would be so much easier to get major corporations to adopt a development platform for rolling out applications housed in the clouds using salesforce.com at its heart.
Oracle would have an incredible brand to build its cloud computing strategy built around an Oracle Software as a service offering.

What really got my attention what something I read in Silicon Valley Watcher. There article provided some really interesting insight....

Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce would make a good successor to replace 63 year old Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, when he retires says Matthew Greeley, CEO of BrightIdea.com. Mr Benioff is used to work at Oracle. When he left Oracle in 1999, Mr Ellison provided seed funding for Salesforce and also served on its board of directors.

-Mr Benioff needs a new challenge, he appears to be losing interest in Salesforce, or at least reducing his financial interest in his company at a rapid daily rate. He has been selling 10,000 Salesforce shares every single day since 21 August 2007. Before then, he sold 20,000 shares every day since 14 November 2006. Prior to that date, Mr Benioff sold thousands of shares every day in variable amounts since 31 July 2006.

[Please see: Insider Trades - Marc Benioff - Yahoo! Finance.]

-An Oracle acquisition of Salesforce would strengthen its strategic position against SAP, the top enterprise application software company. SAP has been slow in figuring out its online strategy, even naming its initiative has been challenging to the company.

UPDATED: Larry Ellison will have to buy Salesforce at some point anyway. Netsuite cannot be scaled to the size of Salesforce in this decade, maybe in the next. The two businesses could be easily integrated, that's the beauty of online software, it's all standards based.

To read the entire Silicon Valley Insider article....

Is Salesforce Worth $75/Share To Oracle?

Some things in this article really stood out...

Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce would make a good successor to replace 63 year old Larry Ellison

Mr Benioff needs a new challenge, he appears to be losing interest in Salesforce, or at least reducing his financial interest in his company at a rapid daily rate.

If Larry Ellison were willing to step down, I can not think of a better person to take over the helm at Oracle then Marc Benioff. Given where the industry is headed, cloud computing, Software as a service. Marc would be a visionary that could take Oracle to new heights. 

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Vulnerability in SQL Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution

Posted on Mon, Dec 22, 2008 @ 10:50 PM
  
  
  
  

Microsoft Security Advisory (961040)

Vulnerability in SQL Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution

Published: December 22, 2008

Microsoft is investigating new public reports of a vulnerability that could allow remote code execution on systems with supported editions of Microsoft SQL Server 2000, Microsoft SQL Server 2005, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition, Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine (MSDE 2000), Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine (WMSDE), and Windows Internal Database (WYukon). Systems with Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 Service Pack 4, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 3, and Microsoft SQL Server 2008 are not affected by this issue.

Microsoft is aware that exploit code has been published on the Internet for the vulnerability addressed by this advisory. Our investigation of this exploit code has verified that it does not affect systems that have had the workarounds listed below applied. Currently, Microsoft is not aware of active attacks that use this exploit code or of customer impact at this time.

In addition, due to the mitigating factors for default installations of MSDE 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express, Microsoft is not currently aware of any third-party applications that use MSDE 2000 or SQL Server 2005 Express which would be vulnerable to remote attack. However, Microsoft is actively monitoring this situation to provide customer guidance as necessary.

We are actively working with partners in our Microsoft Active Protections Program (MAPP) and our Microsoft Security Response Alliance (MSRA) programs to provide information that they can use to provide broader protections to customers.

Upon completion of this investigation, Microsoft will take the appropriate action to protect our customers, which may include providing a solution through a service pack, our monthly security update release process, or an out-of-cycle security update, depending on customer needs.

Customers who believe that they have been attacked can obtain security support at Get security support and should contact the national law enforcement agency in their country. Customers in the United States can contact Customer Service and Support at no charge using the PC Safety hotline at 1-866-PCSAFETY. Additionally, customers in the United States should contact their local FBI office or report their situation at Internet Crime Complaint Center.

Mitigating Factors:

This issue does not affect supported editions of Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 Service Pack 4, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 3, and Microsoft SQL Server 2008.

This vulnerability is not exposed anonymously. An attacker would need to either authenticate to exploit the vulnerability or take advantage of a SQL injection vulnerability in a Web application that is able to authenticate.

By default, MSDE 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express do not allow remote connections. An authenticated attacker would need to initiate the attack locally to exploit the vulnerability.

 

To read the original security alert from Microsoft......

Microsoft Security Advisory (961040)


Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Undersea Cables Cut Effects Internet Europe, Middle East And Asia

Posted on Sat, Dec 20, 2008 @ 02:47 PM
  
  
  
  

3 out of 4 Cables Cut !

 

The Gremlins are back.


 

Once again undersea cables have been cut. 3 out of 4 cables have been cut.  This will effect Internet and phones all though Europe, Middle East & Asia. If the 4th cable gets cut this could be a total blackout.  A total black out.
This has happened quite a few times before. Here are some blogs I did the last time this happened….

Internet Outage Hits India, Middle East Again!!!!!!

Fifth Undersea Cable Cut ! ! !

I found out about the latest problem through an article in the BBC NEWS...


Severed cable disrupts net access

Internet and phone communications between Europe, the Middle East, and Asia have been seriously disrupted after submarine cables were severed.

It is thought the FLAG FEA, SMW4, and SMW3 lines, near the Alexandria cable station in Egypt, have all been cut.

A fault was also reported on the GO submarine cable 130km off Sicily.

Experts warned that it may be days before the fault is fixed and said the knock on effect could have serious repercussions on regional economies.

Jonathan Wright - director of wholesale products at Interoute which manages part of the optical fibre network - told the BBC that the effects of the break would be felt for many days.

"This will grind economies to a halt for a short space of time," he said "If you look at, say, local financial markets who trade with European and US markets, the speed at which they get live data will be compromised."

"If you think how quickly trades can be placed, if they are suffering from bad latency times, then by the time a trade is placed, the market may well have moved on."

The cause of the break is as yet unknown, although some seismic activity was reported near Malta shortly before the cut was detected.

In a statement released in relation to one of the breaks, France Telecom said: "The causes of the cut, which is located in the Mediterranean between Sicily and Tunisia, on sections linking Sicily to Egypt, remain unclear."

The French firm said it was sending a ship out to fix the line between Italy and Egypt, although it could take until 31 December to fully repair the line.

The main damage through is to the four submarine cables running across the Mediterranean and through the Suez Canal.

It is thought that 65% of traffic to India was down, while services to Singapore, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Taiwan and Pakistan have also been severely affected.

To read the Remainder of the article....

Severed cable disrupts net access

 

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

2 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Record Industry (RIAA) AKA Mafia Gets Smart

Posted on Fri, Dec 19, 2008 @ 11:39 AM
  
  
  
  

 

The Record Industry who I akin to the Mafia

The record industry who I like to akin to the Mafia has finally gotten smart. I am no fan. They have used strong-arm tactics against college campuses, students etc. They complain about all the pilfering of music online yet the record industry continues to rake in the money.



Its about time they change there ways.  Here is what recently just happened….

I found this on Techdirt.

RIAA Abandoning Mass Lawsuits In Favor Of Backroom 3 Strikes Policy

from the it's-a-step,-but-a-very-small-one dept

It really was just three days ago that we suggested that if the record labels actually wanted anyone to take them seriously concerning their desire to come up with more constructive solutions to the business model challenges they face, they should at least stop suing folks as a gesture of trying something new. The usual recording industry defenders in the comments claimed this was a ridiculous suggestion, but it appears that the RIAA is at least taking a small step in that direction. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the recording industry (the WSJ mis-labels it "the music industry") is abandoning its strategy of mass lawsuits.

First off, this is a step in the right direction -- and we think it's great that the record labels have agreed to do this, even if it's many, many years too late. And, it's hardly a huge concession. The lawsuits have been an unmitigated disaster. They have done nothing to slow file sharing (in fact, the publicity generated from the lawsuits has often been credited with alerting many people to the possibility). The strategy has also splintered the file sharing space into many, many different players, many of them way underground, unlike in the early days when there were a manageable number of players who could be worked with proactively. It's also done tremendous damage to the brands of the major record labels (Universal, Warner, EMI and Sony) and the RIAA itself -- leading many to swear off buying any of their products. Finally -- and most importantly -- the strategy did absolutely nothing to help musicians adapt to a changing market that was opening up tremendous new opportunities both to spread their music and to profit. So, kudos to the folks at the RIAA for finally realizing how backwards this strategy has been.

The fine print

But, of course, this is the RIAA, so you can rest assured that the details aren't anything to be happy about. In exchange for not filing mass lawsuits, the RIAA has worked out backroom deals with numerous ISPs (brokered by Andrew Cuomo -- who has a history of using baseless threats to get ISPs to censor content they have no legal responsibility to censor). The exact details are a bit sketchy, but it sounds like a variation on the ridiculous three strikes policy that has been (mostly) rejected in Europe as a violation of basic civil rights. Basically, these ISPs will agree to be the RIAA enforcers. Based solely on the RIAA's flimsy evidence, the ISPs will either pass on, or directly email subscribers with, warning letters. Depending on the specifics of the agreement, the users will get one or two more warning letters before the ISP will start limiting their internet access or potentially cutting them off entirely. If you think this sounds suspiciously like what Europe just rejected, you're right.

And, of course, the RIAA still says it may sue those who don't stop file sharing after all of this. They're just backing away from the mass lawsuit filings that they've been doing.

Why this is still a bad deal

Okay, so over the past few weeks, recording industry defenders have said that we were jumping the gun in criticizing a potential plan because it wasn't final. Our point was that since the record labels claim they want a "conversation," these deals shouldn't be negotiated in backrooms not involving substantial stakeholders. So what happened here? Yup, a backroom deal was negotiated without any involvement from users. And it was done under the direction of Andrew Cuomo, who just spent many months browbeating ISPs into agreeing to censor content. 

To read the remainder of the article

RIAA Abandong Mass Lawsuits in Favor of Backroom Strikes Policy

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

If you use Internet Explorer IE Read This ! !

Posted on Thu, Dec 18, 2008 @ 11:06 AM
  
  
  
  

 

This is a pretty important security Bulletin. If you use Internet Explorer and go to a specially crafted web page you could be at real risk.....

 

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-078 - Critical

Security Update for Internet Explorer (960714)

 

 

Executive Summary

This security update resolves a publicly disclosed vulnerability. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a user views a specially crafted Web page using Internet Explorer. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.

This security update is rated Critical for Internet Explorer 5.01, Internet Explorer 6, Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1, and Internet Explorer 7. For information about Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2, please see the section, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Related to This Security Update. For more information, see the subsection, Affected and Non-Affected Software, in this section.

The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying the way Internet Explorer validates data binding parameters and handles the error resulting in the exploitable condition. For more information about the vulnerability, see the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) subsection under the next section, Vulnerability Information.

This security update also addresses the vulnerability first described in Microsoft Security Advisory 961051.

Recommendation. Microsoft recommends that customers apply the update immediately.

Affected and Non-Affected Software

The software listed here have been tested to determine which versions or editions are affected. Other versions or editions are either past their support life cycle or are not affected. To determine the support life cycle for your software version or edition, visit Microsoft Support Lifecycle.

Affected Software

Operating SystemComponentMaximum Security ImpactAggregate Severity RatingBulletins Replaced by This Update
Internet Explorer 5.01 and Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1    

Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.01 Service Pack 4

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Internet Explorer 6    

Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows XP Service Pack 3

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 and Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition and Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 with SP1 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2003 with SP2 for Itanium-based Systems

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Internet Explorer 7    

Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows XP Service Pack 3

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 and Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition and Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Service Pack 2

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2003 with SP1 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2003 with SP2 for Itanium-based Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Vista and Windows Vista Service Pack 1

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Vista x64 Edition and Windows Vista x64 Edition Service Pack 1

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems

Windows Internet Explorer 7

Remote Code Execution

Critical

None

Note For information about Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2, please see the section, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Related to This Security Update.

Vulnerability Information

Severity Ratings and Vulnerability Identifiers

Pointer Reference Memory Corruption Vulnerability - CVE-2008-4844

Update Information

Detection and Deployment Tools and Guidance

Security Update Deployment

 

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-078 - Critical


Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

SQL Server 2008 Compliance Guide (Sarbanes, Hippa)

Posted on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 @ 09:51 PM
  
  
  
  

Compliancy requirements are a real issue for today’s companies.

If you are publicly traded you fall under Sarbanes Oxley act,(Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002). If you are in healthcare you fall under the healthcare Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). If you process credit cards you must meet the requirement of the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Compliance.  New compliancy requirements come up all the time.

Massachusetts just passed a law that could affect your business. This new 201 CMR 17.00: Standards for The Protection of Personal Information of Residents of the Commonwealth comes into effect in 2009.


For example if you are a business in California that takes credit card information on a Massachusetts resident then you must meet the requirement of this new law. 
Joseph J. Laferrera  a lawyer at Gesmer Updegrove LLP Gesmer Updegrove LLP in Boston authored a great whitepaper on this new law.

New Data Security Regulations Have Sweeping
Implications For Massachusetts Businesses

SQL Server 2008 Compliance Guide

Microsoft has published a SQL Server 2008 Compliance guide to help you.

Brief Description

This paper provides an overview of how to approach compliance for the management of the SQL Server database. It describes the compliance-related features of SQL Server 2008 and how to apply them to IT controls. This paper includes tips and scripts to help jump-start compliance solution development.

Overview

Organizations across the globe are being inundated with regulatory requirements. They also have a strong need to better manage their IT systems to ensure they are operating efficiently and staying secure. Microsoft is often asked to provide guidance and technology to assist organizations struggling with compliance. The SQL Server 2008 Compliance Guidance white paper was written to help organizations and individuals understand how to use the features of the Microsoft® SQL Server® 2008 database software to address their compliance needs. This paper serves as an accompaniment to the SQL Server 2008 compliance software development kit (SDK), which provides sample code and guidance for understanding SQL Server 2008 compliance features and using them for developing solutions.

To Get a copy of the Guide:

SQL Server 2008 compliance Guide

 

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 



 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Jury Duty Scam - Protect Yourself

Posted on Tue, Dec 09, 2008 @ 11:53 AM
  
  
  
  

It's amazing the many ways people can think of to steal your identity. If you think it can not happen to you think again. My 19 year old son had his identitty stolen, I would not have thought him a target.  I will reference at the end of this blog some useful security information. Here is an email I recieved:

Here Is The Latest Scam To Steal Your Identity

This has been verified by the FBI (their link is also included below).
Please pass this on to everyone in your email address book. It is
spreading fast so be prepared should you get this call. Most of us take
those summonses for jury duty seriously, but enough people skip out on
their civic duty, that a new and ominous kind of fraud has surfaced.

The caller claims to be a jury coordinator. If you protest that you never received a summons for jury duty, the scammer asks you for your....

Here is the Scam

Social Security number and date of birth so he/she can verify the
information and cancel the arrest warrant.

Give out any of this

information and bingo; your identity was just stolen.


The fraud has been reported so far in 11 states, including Oklahoma ,
Illinois , and Colorado . This (swindle) is particularly insidious
because they use intimidation over the phone to try to bully people into
giving information by pretending they are with the court system. The FBI
and the federal court system have issued nationwide alerts on their web
sites, warning consumers about the fraud.

Check it out here:

Link to FBI Site Validation of Scam

 Here is what posted from the FBI Site...

THE VERDICT: HANG UP
Don't Fall for Jury Duty Scam

06/02/06

Jury Duty Graphic

The phone rings, you pick it up, and the caller identifies himself as an officer of the court. He says you failed to report for jury duty and that a warrant is out for your arrest. You say you never received a notice. To clear it up, the caller says he'll need some information for "verification purposes"-your birth date, social security number, maybe even a credit card number.

This is when you should hang up the phone. It's a scam.

Jury scams have been around for years, but have seen a resurgence in recent months. Communities in more than a dozen states have issued public warnings about cold calls from people claiming to be court officials seeking personal information. As a rule, court officers never ask for confidential information over the phone; they generally correspond with prospective jurors via mail.

The scam's bold simplicity may be what makes it so effective. Facing the unexpected threat of arrest, victims are caught off guard and may be quick to part with some information to defuse the situation.

"They get you scared first," says a special agent in the Minneapolis field office who has heard the complaints. "They get people saying, 'Oh my gosh! I'm not a criminal. What's going on?'" That's when the scammer dangles a solution-a fine, payable by credit card, that will clear up the problem.

With enough information, scammers can assume your identity and empty your bank accounts.

"It seems like a very simple scam," the agent adds. The trick is putting people on the defensive, then reeling them back in with the promise of a clean slate. "It's kind of ingenious. It's social engineering."

In recent months, communities in Florida, New York, Minnesota, Illinois, Colorado, Oregon, California, Virginia, Oklahoma, Arizona, and New Hampshire reported scams or posted warnings or press releases on their local websites. In August, the federal court system issued a warning on the scam and urged people to call their local District Court office if they receive suspicious calls. In September, the FBI issued a press release about jury scams and suggested victims also contact their local FBI field office.

In March, USA.gov, the federal government’s information website, posted details about jury scams in their Frequently Asked Questions area. The site reported scores of queries on the subject from website visitors and callers seeking information.

The jury scam is a simple variation of the identity-theft ploys that have proliferated in recent years as personal information and good credit have become thieves' preferred prey, particularly on the Internet. Scammers might tap your information to make a purchase on your credit card, but could just as easily sell your information to the highest bidder on the Internet's black market.

Protecting yourself is the key: Never give out personal information when you receive an unsolicited phone call.

 

 

 

More Information

Want to learn more about new and common scams like this one? Then sign up for our e-mil alerts.


 

 

 

Useful Blog on what to do if your Identity is Stolen



Identity Theft Hits Home Lessons Learned

 

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Freeware Application Turns Ipod Music Player Into Phone

Posted on Sun, Dec 07, 2008 @ 03:35 PM
  
  
  
  

Its Amazing what is out on the Internet if you know where to look. I am an avid Ipod user. I use it every day. I have been thinking about getting an iphone. When I saw this latest article from the BBC News it immediately caught my attention.


Wireless turns iPod into a phone

A freeware application for the iPod Touch can turn the music player into a virtual mobile phone.

Truphone uses wi-fi technology in an iPod Touch to allow users to make calls to other iPod Touch owners and Google Talk's messaging service users.

The software is a spin-off from technology Truphone developed for smartphones and iPhones.

The developers plan to have the ability to make calls to and from landlines in place very soon.

Truphone is the latest firm to offer voice over internet protocol (VoIP), alongside Unlicensed Mobile Access and proprietary protocols such as Skype.

Geraldine Wilson - Truphone's CEO - said the firm had ambitions to become a global internet player.

"There are a slew of new features we're rolling out for the iPod Touch that will let users call landlines, Skype users or send instant messages. We're talking weeks, not months, before these go live."

Although Truphone technology can, in theory, work on any mobile device, the firm is concentrating on devices that have an application store.

To read the entire article....

Wireless turns Ipod into a Phone

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com


 

 

 

 

 

2 Comments Click here to read/write comments

SQL Server 2008 Enterprise/Standard Comparision

Posted on Fri, Dec 05, 2008 @ 09:57 PM
  
  
  
  

Ever wonder what the difference is between SQL Server 2008 Enterprise Edition and SQL Server 2008 Standard edition. Well Microsoft has published a document that provides such a comparison. At the end of this blog is a link so you can get the entire document. Here are a few highlights from the document:

SQL Server 2008 Enterprise

SQL Server 2008 Enterprise is a comprehensive data platform for running mission critical online transaction processing (OLTP), data warehousing (DW) and business intelligence (BI) applications. SQL Server 2008 Enterprise provides enterprise class scalability, high availability and security to meet the high demands of these applications.
Enterprise is ideally suited for the following usage scenarios:


- Mission critical deployments requiring high availability and uptime
- Existing large scale OLTP deployments
- OLTP deployments that expect to grow rapidly in the future
- Large scale reporting and analysis deployments
- Data Warehousing
- Server Consolidation

SQL Server 2008 Standard

SQL Server 2008 Standard is a full featured data platform for running departmental online transaction processing (OLTP) and business intelligence (BI) applications. SQL Server 2008 Standard provides best-in-class ease of use and manageability for running departmental applications.


Standard is ideally suited for the following usage scenarios:
- Departmental deployments
- Small to medium scale OLTP deployments
- OLTP deployments that are not expected to rapidly grow in the future
- Reporting and analysis deployments

The table below provides a high level comparison of the key capabilities between SQL Server 2008 Enterprise and Standard:

 

To obtain the entire report, with lots of really useful information.....

SQL Server 2008 Enterprise/Standard Comparision

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com


0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Microsoft Taps Yahoo Veteran for Online Services Group

Posted on Thu, Dec 04, 2008 @ 10:36 PM
  
  
  
  

On Saturday November 29th, I reported on my blog the Microsoft Yahoo talks were back on.  I am sure this will go back and forth for a while. Its does not surprise me that Microsoft has tapped a senior executive from Yahoo for such a key position at Microsoft. Yahoo better be careful, Microsoft might go forward without them, and do it all themselves. As a Yahoo shareholder I would hate to see that happen.



Here is a copy of the Microsoft Press Release:

Microsoft Appoints Dr. Qi Lu to Run Online Services Group

Yahoo! veteran to oversee Internet offerings for consumers, advertisers and publishers.

 

REDMOND, Wash. — Dec. 4, 2008 — Microsoft Corp. today announced that Dr. Qi Lu will join the company as president of the Online Services Group. Dr. Lu will lead Microsoft’s efforts in search and online advertising and all the company’s online information and communications services. Dr. Lu will report to Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer.

Lu, 47, most recently served as executive vice president of Engineering for the Search and Advertising Technology Group at Yahoo!, where he was responsible for development efforts around Yahoo!’s Web search and monetization platforms. Dr. Lu left Yahoo! in August 2008 after 10 years of service.

“I am tremendously excited to welcome Qi to Microsoft,” Ballmer said. “Dr. Lu’s deep technical expertise, leadership capabilities and hard-working mentality are well-known in the technology industry, and Microsoft will benefit from his addition to our executive management team.”

“I am genuinely excited about the opportunities ahead for Microsoft to make an enormous impact on the online industry,” Dr. Lu said. “Microsoft has built a great foundation for its search and advertising technologies and put an amazing team of researchers and engineers in place to drive the next wave of innovation in online services. I’m looking forward to working with them to help transform the way people and businesses use the Internet to find and share information.”

Before his most recent role at Yahoo!, Lu was vice president of engineering responsible for the technology development of Yahoo!’s Search and Marketplace business unit, which includes the company’s search, e-commerce, and local listings of businesses and products.

Before joining Yahoo! in 1998, Dr. Lu was a Research Staff Member at IBM Almaden Research Center. Before IBM, Dr. Lu worked at Carnegie Mellon University as a Research Associate, and at Fudan University in China as a faculty member. Dr. Lu holds 20 U.S. patents, and received his bachelor of science and master of science in computer science from Fudan University and his Ph.D. in computer science from Carnegie Mellon University.

Lu’s first day at Microsoft will be Jan. 5, 2009. In his role running the Online Services Group, he will oversee several groups including the Advertiser & Publisher Solutions business, managed by Scott Howe who was promoted to corporate vice president; the Online Audience business, managed by Senior Vice President Yusuf Mehdi; OSG Research & Development, managed by Senior Vice President Satya Nadella; and OSG Finance, managed by Rik van der Kooi who was promoted to corporate vice president.

With the successful integration of aQuantive now complete, Brian McAndrews, former CEO of aQuantive and senior vice president of Microsoft’s Advertiser & Publisher Solutions Group, has decided to transition out of Microsoft, and will do so over the next several months, serving in a consultative capacity to Steve Ballmer and Qi Lu during that time.

“Brian McAndrews built a world-class business for advertisers and publishers and led the successful integration of aQuantive into Microsoft, setting the foundation for our next phase of growth,” Ballmer said. “While I am sorry to see Brian leave the company, I respect and understand his decision and wish him nothing but the best in the future.”

“I also want to congratulate Scott and Rik on their well-deserved promotions and look forward to their leadership in the Online Services Group alongside Qi, Yusuf and Satya,” Ballmer said.

As part of today’s announcement, several teams will move to further align resources. The field sales organizations in the Online Services Group will move to Microsoft’s centralized Sales, Marketing and Services Group led by chief operating officer Kevin Turner. This group, called Consumer & Online, will be led by Corporate Vice President Darren Huston and will include the Global Advertising Sales and Services organization, led by vice president Bill Shaughnessy.

Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq “MSFT”) is the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.

Note to editors: If you are interested in viewing additional information on Microsoft, please visit the Microsoft Web page at http://www.microsoft.com/presspass on Microsoft’s corporate information pages. Web links, telephone numbers and titles were correct at time of publication, but may since have changed. For additional assistance, journalists and analysts may contact Microsoft’s Rapid Response Team or other appropriate contacts listed at http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/contactpr.mspx.

To go to the original Microsoft Press Release...

Microsoft Appoints Dr. Qi Lu to Run Online Services Group

Fresh Off the Press From Microsoft. December 10th

New President of Online Services Group Sees Chance to Make Impact at Microsoft

Q&A: Qi Lu discusses what attracted him to Microsoft and how he plans to boost the company’s efforts in online search and advertising.

REDMOND, WASH. – Dec. 10, 2008 – On Dec. 4, Microsoft announced Qi Lu had been hired as president of the Online Services Group. Lu will lead Microsoft’s efforts to expand and strengthen its search and online advertising efforts.

Lu comes to Microsoft four months after leaving Yahoo!, where he most recently held the position of executive vice president of Engineering for the Search and Advertising Technology Group. During his 10 years at Yahoo, Lu gained a reputation as top-tier technologist and superb manager. Before joining Yahoo! in 1998, Lu was a Research Staff Member at IBM’s Almaden Research Center. He also has worked at Carnegie Mellon University as a Research Associate and at Fudan University in China as a faculty member. Lu holds 20 U.S. patents, and received his Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in computer science from Fudan University in Shanghai, and his Ph.D. in computer science from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pa.

PressPass spoke with Lu shortly after the announcement of his new position.

PressPass: Why Microsoft? What was behind your decision to take this new role?

Dr. Qi Lu speaks to Microsoft employees at a Town Hall event on Dec. 8 in Redmond, Wash. Lu will join Microsoft as president of the Online Services Group effective Jan. 5, 2009.
Dr. Qi Lu speaks to Microsoft employees at a Town Hall event on Dec. 8 in Redmond, Wash. Lu will join Microsoft as president of the Online Services Group effective Jan. 5, 2009.
Click for high-res version.

Lu: For me, the answer is impact. In my professional career the biggest motivating factor for me is always being in a position to have great impact in what I do. I'm always interested in being in a position or in a place to build the technologies, products or businesses that enable our customers, our users, to be able to do more and be more.

I cannot think of a better platform to have an impact than this position at Microsoft, because we have tremendous opportunities ahead to achieve great impact for our users, our customers and our industry. That's why I'm very excited about this opportunity.

PressPass: When you say you can have an impact through Microsoft, what is it you mean?

Lu: Specifically, it’s the strength of technology and the talent at Microsoft – along with a broad-based online audience, the foundations of its search products and the assets in our advertising platforms. All those things enable our products and our businesses to reach vast numbers of users and customers so we can make a tremendous contribution to our industry as a whole.

PressPass: When you were at Yahoo!, how do you view Microsoft as a competitor?

Lu: I’ve always had a great deal of respect for Microsoft as a company. In my view, Microsoft is one of the most, if not the most, successful companies in terms of value creation, and in terms of producing technology and products that transform society. In my view, Microsoft is a company that really brought computing to every household, and that created a tremendous amount of value to the users and to the overall economy.

As a competitor, you never cut out Microsoft. They keep coming at you. In that way, I’ve always held Microsoft in very high regard.

Also, the people at Microsoft are extraordinary technologists – extremely capable, bright individuals. So, from the standpoint of looking in from the outside, there is tremendous strength in the core talent of Microsoft’s R&D. In my view, this is one of the key foundations of building winning products and winning business in the marketplace.

PressPass: Steve Ballmer recruited you to join Microsoft. How did he make his pitch?

Lu: Steve and I first met last September, in a hotel in San Jose, California. We spent almost half a day talking. We talked about the competitive landscape, about the possibility to really innovate and take the user experience [of Microsoft’s search capabilities] to the next level, and about creating a more competitive space, particularly in the search space. We all believe that it's better for everybody involved when we have a healthy, more competitive environment.

Two things he said really stood out. First was the level of commitment on investment. Steve made it very clear how he views that as critical for the long-term future of Microsoft, and his strong commitment to invest in R&D resources is very, very important to me.

The other thing Steve said that helped convince me this was the right thing for me to do was his commitment to product quality, because you compete in the marketplace on the strength of the product that you bring to the market. You must have a strong commitment to protect the quality of the user experience in the product that you build.

PressPass: When you look broadly at the search space, what sorts of trends do you see playing out over the next year or two?

Lu: There are tremendous opportunities for product innovation, and there are several key forces that are driving us towards that.

One is the advent of more powerful computing infrastructures, [such as] cloud computing infrastructures that enable R&D teams to go through a vast amount of data and find and fix problems very, very quickly. This enables teams to improve the product quality at a much faster rate, and also will help us better understand user intent when they do a search. And the more we understand user intent, the more we can present better search results and an overall search experience that is dramatically improved from where we are today, whether it's through better completion of a particular task or the discovery of very useful and interesting information.

Another trend is the Web as a platform for publishing all sorts of content. There is more and more rich and fresh content, and more engaging social content. So, there is a lot more material to work with. If we're able to understand user intent better, and combine that with the richer content available out there, we will be able to produce a very engaging search experience.

PressPass: Where do you see the opportunities for Microsoft in the search and online space?

Lu: First, I think there is a genuine opportunity to take our search products to the next level. I see that Microsoft's search product quality is improving at a very, very fast rate, that there are great foundations there. And with the technology base, the talent base, the computing infrastructures, I'm confident that we will be in a position to produce a differentiated and compelling search experience.

The second opportunity is to continue building a very powerful advertising platform. Microsoft has made a series of strategic acquisitions, and also built a bunch of internal technologies and products. The key is to put all those assets together to build powerful, highly scalable advertising platforms. The advertising we see today will be very different in the future because of new platforms for it. Ads will be truly relevant and useful, and the experience will be compelling.

PressPass: Whenever anyone talks about competition in search, the target always is Google. Are they catchable?

Lu: Well, we're here to win, and my view on this is that to win in the search space, fundamentally you build on the strengths of your product. And we know what it takes to build a compelling user experience and winning product, which is to have a powerful infrastructure, great talent and put great processes in place so that we can out-develop, out-market, out-innovate our competitors.

But make no mistake; I think Google is a very, very powerful company. They are definitely ahead in the search space. There are a lot of challenges ahead. We've got our work cut out for us.

PressPass: You begin your new job January 5. What will be your first priority?

Lu: I would say hit the gym first. That's actually literally what I do first. Usually I get up reasonably early and try to hit the gym.

But seriously, I'm very much looking forward to hit the ground running. I will try to meet with lots of people, teams, individuals, and work very closely with my directs, my staff and their direct staff to try to get up to speed as fast as I can. I want to make sure the whole organization is very clear on what we are trying to hit, and is energized about our mission and our goals. We have a clear path from where we are today, to where we need to be, and to reach that next level we need to keep executing and building winning products.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

Bankruptcy Is Not The End of U.S. Auto Industry, It the Beginning

Posted on Mon, Dec 01, 2008 @ 01:27 AM
  
  
  
  

Should We Bail Out the Auto Industry?

 

Should be bail out the Auto Industry, Should we not. Not. My friends and I go round and round on this issue. There are a lot of jobs at stake here.  I get it! ! !.  I also see a lot of companies with their hands out who don’t get it. It really bothers me that they came flying in there corporate jets to ask for the money.  When times are tough, it means we all make adjustments. We suck it up.




I have 3 people in my household attending college right now. Money is very tight.  A college education is a very expensive undertaking. To help get by we have made adjustments in the way we live. Everything from making sure we shut lights off at nice, to save on the electricity bill, to taking much more modest vacations, to making due with what we have or doing without. Showing up in Washington D.C. via the corporate jet tells me they don’t get it. They have not taken a serious look at their companies and found ways where they can cut back and cut costs.  It starts at the top and permeates all the way to the bottom. If senior management wasn’t serious about cutting back, why would else in the company be serious about it.

At times of great crisis in the United States, we have had real leaders rise to the occasion.  I hope the elected officials set there political views aside and do what is best for America.


















Bankruptcy Is not the End of the U.S. Auto Industry, It is a new Beginning.


The U.S. auto industry is not competitive today. Handing over Tax Payer dollars to continue business as usual is a huge mistake. It may buy us a few years, it may save a few jobs for a while eventually it is doomed to failure as it exists and operates today.

Going into Bankruptcy is a chance for the industry to restructure itself and thrive moving forward. It’s a chance to rewrite Union contracts so the  U.S. Auto Industry can be competitive again. It’s a chance to rewrite Management packages so they make sense.  It’s a complete restructure of the business and if the stakeholders don’t work together, they all loose. Until the U.S. Auto industry has taken the time to make those changes they have no right to ask the Tax Payers to bail them out. A perfect example is the corporate jets. Perhaps it is more cost effective for a U.S. Auto maker to have a fleet of jets, on the other hand perhaps they should be sold off.  I feel Bankruptcy if the path needed to help this industry get back to long-term viable health. 

Mitt Romney was a past Governor of Massachusetts.  Mitt made a lot of money knowing what companies to invest in and what companies not to invest in. He recently posted an opinion that was picked up my the N.Y. Times. Here is a portion of that article….

Op-Ed Contributor

Let Detroit Go Bankrupt

By MITT ROMNEY

Published: November 18, 2008

IF General Motors, Ford and Chrysler get the bailout that their chief executives asked for yesterday, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It won’t go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed.

Without that bailout, Detroit will need to drastically restructure itself. With it, the automakers will stay the course — the suicidal course of declining market shares, insurmountable labor and retiree burdens, technology atrophy, product inferiority and never-ending job losses. Detroit needs a turnaround, not a check.

I love cars, American cars. I was born in Detroit, the son of an auto chief executive. In 1954, my dad, George Romney, was tapped to run American Motors when its president suddenly died. The company itself was on life support — banks were threatening to deal it a death blow. The stock collapsed. I watched Dad work to turn the company around — and years later at business school, they were still talking about it. From the lessons of that turnaround, and from my own experiences, I have several prescriptions for Detroit’s automakers.

First, their huge disadvantage in costs relative to foreign brands must be eliminated. That means new labor agreements to align pay and benefits to match those of workers at competitors like BMW, Honda, Nissan and Toyota. Furthermore, retiree benefits must be reduced so that the total burden per auto for domestic makers is not higher than that of foreign producers.


That extra burden is estimated to be more than $2,000 per car. Think what that means: Ford, for example, needs to cut $2,000 worth of features and quality out of its Taurus to compete with Toyota’s Avalon. Of course the Avalon feels like a better product — it has $2,000 more put into it. Considering this disadvantage, Detroit has done a remarkable job of designing and engineering its cars. But if this cost penalty persists, any bailout will only delay the inevitable.

To read the entire article.....

Let Detroit Go Bankrupt

Posted Michael Corey,

Founder & CEO, Ntirety

www.ntirety.com

 

 

 

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

All Posts | Next Page